Home

helps physicians and healthcare professionals

Erectile Dysfunction

helps physicians and healthcare professionals

Doctor123.org

helps physicians and healthcare professionals

Intussusception

para>5% of all intussusceptions occur in adults
  • <5% of intestinal obstruction cases in adults are due to intussusception (1)[B].

  • 90% of adult cases have pathologic lead point (1)[B].

  •  
    Pediatric Considerations
    • Annual incidence 5.4 cases per 10,000 infants in United States.

    • Most are idiopathic ileocolic intussusceptions; pathologic lead point identified only in 2-12%

    • Most common abdominal emergency in infancy (2)[C]

    • Postoperative intussusception (1 to 24 days postoperatively) typically involves the small bowel and is difficult to reduce hydrostatically.

     

    EPIDEMIOLOGY


    • Predominant age
      • 5 to 10 months (~65% are <1 year of age)
      • Only ~10-25% of cases occur after 1 year of age.
    • Predominant sex: male > female (3:2). Male preponderance is more obvious in older infants.

    ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY


    • Children
      • Marked hypertrophy of Peyer patches: 92-98%
      • Lead point in 2-12%
        • Meckel diverticulum, duplication cyst, aberrant tissue, intestinal polyp, ectopic pancreas, lymphoma, Henoch-Sch śnlein purpura as causes of pathologic lead point (if identified)
      • Allergic reactions, diet changes, and changes in intestinal activity may be contributory.
      • Idiopathic intussusceptions commonly associated with preceding adenovirus infection (24-40%)
      • 1/10,000 to 1/32,000 vaccinated children developed intussusception with previous versions of rotavirus vaccine which has been withdrawn (3)[C].
      • Safety and efficacy trials of newer rotavirus vaccines (RV1 [Rotarix] and RV5 [RotaTeq]) show minimal intussusception risk (5.3 per 100,000 infants with RV1 and 1.5 excess cases of intussusception per 100,000 with RV5) (4,5,6,7,8)[A].
    • Adults: Pathologic lead point is typical.
      • Neoplasm in 70% of adult intussusceptions
      • Intussusception of small bowel is usually caused by benign neoplasms; large bowel is usually caused by malignant neoplasms.

    RISK FACTORS


    • Age (<1 year of age)
    • Recent upper respiratory tract infection (24-40%)
    • Recent operation (1 to 24 days previously)
    • Recent viral GI illness
    • Meckel diverticulum
    • Recent operative procedure

    COMMONLY ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS


    • Henoch-Sch śnlein purpura
      • Intussusception is a rare but well-recognized complication.
    • Cystic fibrosis
      • Intussusceptions occur in ~1% of cystic fibrosis patients.
    • Lymphoma (rare)
    • Polyps (rare)
    • Small bowel carcinoma

    DIAGNOSIS


    HISTORY


    • History of intermittent colicky abdominal pain
      • Episodes lasting 5 to 10 minutes
      • Often completely asymptomatic between episodes
    • Most have vomiting.
    • History of bloody stool ("currant jelly" stools): 65-95%, highest in infants
    • Diarrhea: 7%

    PHYSICAL EXAM


    • Lethargy (with longer duration of illness): 22%
    • Palpable mass, typically right lower quadrant: 16-41%
    • Prolapse through anus: 3%
    • Fever
    • Pallor
    • In postoperative patients, intussusception typically presents as a small bowel obstruction.
    • Abdominal distension, depending on the duration of symptoms and degree of obstruction
    • Dance sign: retraction of the right lower quadrant above the iliac fossa
    • Bowel sounds initially hyperactive; may be absent later in the course
    • Abdominal tenderness
    • Hemoccult positive stool

    DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS


    • Adhesive-band small bowel obstruction
    • Appendicitis
    • Gastroenteritis
    • Rectal prolapse (if intussuscepted bowel protrudes from anus)

    DIAGNOSTIC TESTS & INTERPRETATION


    Initial Tests (lab, imaging)
    • Electrolytes
    • CBC
    • Urinalysis
    • Stool guaiac
    • Abdominal US is the diagnostic test of choice in children (9)[A].
    • Abdominal CT scan is mandatory in adults (10)[C].
    • Plain film: flat and upright abdominal films for alternate diagnosis or to rule out perforation

    Diagnostic Procedures/Other
    • Contrast enema (barium, water-soluble contrast material, or air)
    • Colonoscopy may be useful in adults presenting with subacute or chronic colonic obstruction (1)[B].

    Test Interpretation
    • Hyperplasia of Peyer lymphatic patches of terminal ileum (92%), with or without mesenteric lymphadenopathy in children
    • Recognizable lead point, 2-12% in children; >90% in adults (70% caused by neoplasms)

    TREATMENT


    GENERAL MEASURES


    • IV fluid resuscitation
    • Foley catheter (if severely dehydrated)
    • Nasogastric tube
    • Antibiotics if necrotic bowel present
    • Surgical consultation prior to enema reduction attempt
    • Nonoperative care (2)[C],(9)[A]
      • Hydrostatic/pneumatic reduction of intussusception (50-80% success)
      • Pneumatic reduction is preferred over hydrostatic reduction (lower cost, safer if perforation occurs).
      • Pneumatic reduction pressure should not exceed 120 mm Hg (16 kPa).
      • Barium column should be 40- to 42-inches high.
      • Enema is continued as long as progress is made. Contrast material may be drained and the enema repeated up to 3 times.
      • Hydrostatic/pneumatic reduction of intussusception should be performed in hospitals with specialized pediatric care, if possible, especially in children >4 years of age (11)[C].

    SURGERY/OTHER PROCEDURES


    • Right lower quadrant incision with direct manipulation
    • If unable to reduce nonviable bowel, segmental resection with reanastomosis
      • The rate of intestinal resection in children's hospitals is 1-9%, whereas the reported rate of intestinal resection in general (nonpediatric) hospitals is reported as 1-47%, with a rate of 38% in a recent review of 11 general hospitals (11)[C].
    • Enterotomy if lead point is suspected
    • Incidental appendectomy: Tertiary centers with adequate minimally invasive skills often have laparoscopy as the primary surgical technique.
    • Postoperative intussusception usually requires laparotomy and operative reduction (12)[C].
    • Many adults do not have preoperative diagnosis of intussusception (only 65% in one series) (13)[C].
    • In adults, segmental bowel resection is usually required.
    • In adults, low recurrence with ventral rectopexy (14)[A].

    INPATIENT CONSIDERATIONS


    Admission Criteria/Initial Stabilization
    • Inpatient support until reduced or resolved
    • Consider admitting infants for observation after nonoperative reduction due to higher risk for recurrence within 48 hours.

    Discharge Criteria
    • Normal bowel function
    • Tolerating regular diet
    • Resolution of abdominal pain

    ONGOING CARE


    FOLLOW-UP RECOMMENDATIONS


    Liquid diet may be started and diet can be advanced as tolerated after successful reduction.  
    Patient Monitoring
    Office visit 1 to 2 weeks after discharge  

    DIET


    Start liquids after abdominal distension resolves and bowel function returns.  

    PATIENT EDUCATION


    Possibility of recurrence is 5-13%. 40% of recurrences occur in the first 48 hours after reduction.  

    PROGNOSIS


    • Mortality <1-2%
    • Recurrence after hydrostatic reduction: 5-13%; recurrence after operative reduction: 1-3%

    COMPLICATIONS


    • Bowel perforation (0.1% with barium enema, 0.4% with liquid enema, 0.6% with pneumatic reduction)
    • Prolonged ileus
    • Adhesions; intestinal obstruction (surgical reduction)
    • Incisional hernia with surgical reduction
    • Ischemic intestine requiring second operation
    • Recurrence

    REFERENCES


    11 Marinis  A, Yiallourou  A, Samanides  L, et al. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review. World J Gastroenterol.  2009;15(4):407-411.22 Sorantin  E, Lindbichler  F. Management of intussusception. Eur Radiol.  2004;14(Suppl 4):L146-L154.33 Bines  JE. Rotavirus vaccines and intussusception risk. Curr Opin Gastroenterol.  2005;21(1):20-25.44 Ruiz-Palacios  GM, P Šrez-Schael  I, Vel Ązquez  FR, et al. Safety and efficacy of an attenuated vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med.  2006;354(1):11-22.55 Vesikari  T, Matson  DO, Dennehy  P, et al. Safety and efficacy of a pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine. N Engl J Med.  2006;354(1):23-33.66 Rha  B, Tate  JE, Weintraub  E, et al. Intussusception following rotavirus vaccination: an updated review of the available evidence. Expert Rev Vaccines.  2014;13(11):1339-1348.77 Weintraub  ES, Baggs  J, Duffy  J, et al. Risk of intussusceptions after monovalent rotavirus vaccination. N Engl J Med.  2014;370(6):513-519.88 Yih  WK, Lieu  TA, Kulldorff  M, et al. Intussusception risk after rotavirus vaccination in U.S. infants. N Engl J Med.  2014;370(6):503-512.99 Ito  Y, Kusakawa  I, Murata  Y, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of intussusception in children, 2011. Pediatr Int.  2012;54(6):948-958.1010 Baleato-Gonz Ąles  S, Vilanova  JC, Garc ­a-Figueiras  R, et al. Intussusception in adults: what radiologists should know. Emerg Radiol.  2012;19(2):89-101.1111 Shekherdimian  S, Lee  SL. Management of pediatric intussusception in general hospitals: diagnosis, treatment, and differences based on age. World J Pediatr.  2011;7(1):70-73.1212 Holcomb  GWIII, Ross  AJIII, O'Neill  JAJr. Postoperative intussusception: increasing frequency or increasing awareness? South Med J.  1991;84(11):1334-1339.1313 Wang  N, Cui  X, Liu  Y, et al. Adult intussusception: a retrospective review of 41 cases. World J Gastroenterol.  2009;15(26):3303-3308.1414 Samaranayake  CB, Luo  C, Plank  AW, et al. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis.  2010;12(6):504-512.

    ADDITIONAL READING


    • Apelt  N, Featherstone  N, Giuliani  S. Laparoscopic treatment of intussusception in children: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg.  2013;48(8):1789-1793.
    • Applegate  KE. Intussusception in children: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Radiol.  2009;39(Suppl 2):S140-S143.
    • Charles  T, Penninga  L, Reurings  JC, et al. Intussusception in children: a clinical review. Acta Chir Bleg.  2015;115(5):327-333.
    • Soares-Weiser  K, Maclehose  H, Bergman  H, et al. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhea: vaccines in use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  2012;(11):CD008521.

    SEE ALSO


    Cystic Fibrosis; Henoch-Sch śnlein Purpura; Intestinal Obstruction  

    CODES


    ICD10


    K56.1 Intussusception  

    ICD9


    560.0 Intussusception  

    SNOMED


    • Intussusception of intestine (disorder)
    • Ileocolic intussusception
    • Intussusception of colon

    CLINICAL PEARLS


    • The classic presentation for intussusception is intermittent infantile abdominal pain, vomiting, and currant jelly stools with a palpable right lower quadrant mass following an upper respiratory (adenovirus) infection.
    • Abdominal ultrasound is the diagnostic test of choice for pediatric intussusception.
    • Abdominal CT is preferred for adults
    • A lead point is present in ~10% of children <1 year of age (most commonly Meckel's diverticulum).
    • Pathologic lead points are present in >90% of adults, (most commonly a neoplasm).
    Copyright © 2016 - 2017
    Doctor123.org | Disclaimer